Redgrave advertised to sell his business premises and a share in his business, representing that it brought in between £300 and £400 a year when it truly grossed less than £200 a year. The defendant then wrote to the solicitor asking the amount of business completed in the last three years. Facts. In-house law team, Contract law – Misrepresentation – Specific performance. It is important to note that the court did not find fraudulent misrepresentation. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) Redgrave, an elderly solicitor, advertised for a partner "who would not object to purchase advertiser's suburban residence, suitable for a family, value £1600'. The defendant subsequently agreed to purchase the property but having placed a deposit on the property and taking possession, he found the business was actually worthless and refused to complete the remainder of the agreement. Redgrave v Hurd: CA 1881 The plaintiff, an elderly solicitor wishing to retire, advertised for someone to enter into partnership with him and to buy his house. WikiMili The Free Encyclopedia Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell [1965] 1 QB 525. Redgrave v Hurd It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Book. Hurd Redgrave v Hurd. Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! No inducement if contract entered for independent reasons, It does not matter if he checked the truth of the statement p. The court allowed the rescission saying: The plaintiff sued for specific performance. Judgement for the case Redgrave v Hurd R was going to sell H his house at a high value based on the fact that H would also be taking over his solicitor’s practice that he claimed brough in £300 a year. Case Brief Wiki is a FANDOM Lifestyle Community. Plaintiff Mr Redgrave showed him summaries that came … Looking for a flexible role? However, the judge rejects this and says that the only limitation on suing for a misrepresentation is the limitation period, which starts when the fraud reasonably should have been discovered. Where you have neither evidence that he knew the facts showing that the statement was untrue, or that he did anything to show that he did not rely upon the statement, the inference remains that he relied upon the statement as being a material statement (condition) in the contract. Course: Law of Contracts Date: Fall/Winter (2000-2001) Professor: Berryman (Fall) & Whiteside (Winter) Textbook: Contract Law in Canada Please distribute and reproduce these notes freely Although great care has been taken to prepare these notes there may be errors and omissions. Contract law – Misrepresentation – Specific performance. The plaintiff was a solicitor who constructed an advertisement titled ‘Law Partnership’ where he sought a successor who he would take as a Partner on the basis that the … The defendant responded to the advertisement and negotiations followed, in which the plaintiff stated that the practice brought him in … Take your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. After few years when he realized that the law practice was “absolutely useless“, he refused to make any more payments. Redgrave v Hurd. Issue Redgrave was successful at trial an… Redgrave brought an action for specific performance against Hurd. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. In Redgrave v. Hurd, an English contract law case, it was held that, “A contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. United Kingdom Redgrave v Hurd (1881), 20 Ch D 1 Case Summary Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 The plaintiff solicitor advertised for a partner who would also purchase his residence. Defendant Rescission can vary depending on the circumstances, ie by notifying the police when a car has been sold to a thief because of a misrepresentation. 187 Clough v London and North Western Railway Co (1871) LR 7 Exch 26. This can only be refuted by proving that the party hearing the representation had definite knowledge to the contrary, or by explicit evidence that they did not rely on the representation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. Redgrave v Hurd 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1. He was told the partnership had an income of £300 per year and was given the opportunity to look at the accounts. However, if these cannot be shown then the contract can be rescinded upon discovery of the fraudulent misrepresentation. We also have a number of sample law papers, each written to a specific grade, to illustrate the work delivered by our academic services. He said “you examine my books of account to verify this fact”. 1881 Mere fact that party misled has had opportunity of investigating and ascertaining whether representation is true will not necessarily deprive that person of right to claim to have been deceived by it. In this case the judge finds the misrepresentation to have been innocent. Representation When the practice proved to be "utterly worthless", the purchasing lawyer sued for rescission of the contract. A matter for the court was to establish the extent of the misrepresentation of the plaintiff and whether the defendant should have been expected to undertake further research into the proposed business by having a look at the accounts which had been presented by the plaintiff. In Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1, a solicitor wanted t o buy the practice of another solicitor. The plaintiff sued for specific performance. This can be rebutted by proving knowledge to the contrary of the statement, or express proof that the party did not rely on the statement. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Redgrave v Hurd The seller told the buyer that the practice was worth £300 a year and invited him to check this. go to www.studentlawnotes.com to listen to the full audio summary As held in Redgrave v Hurd, if a material representation has been made to the representee than he is said to have relied on the statement by the representor, inducing the contract. In Redgrave v Hurd, 53 false statements were made by the plaintiff about the income of his practice as a solicitor, on the strength of which the defendant had entered into a contract to buy the plaintiff’s house and practice. D. 1 (Court of Appeal). Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 A solicitor purchased into the partnership in the solicitors' firm. The offended party sued for particular execution. Therefore, the contract can be rescinded but damages are not awarded. Redgrave Hurd However, as a counter argument, In the case of Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1, Edwin refused to sign the contract because he may be hesitating when he heard that an Arabian Sheik was on the look out for the rare car and is willing to pay $700,000. The court reversed the decision of the trial judge and they allowed the contract to be rescinded on the basis of innocent misrepresentation. It was held that, although the plaintiff had gone into possession of the land and taken possession of the chattels, the contract was still executory, to … Court of Appeal of England and Wales cases, https://casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd?oldid=8867. View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch. He declined the offer to check the accounts and took them at their word. Therefore, its being untrue is sufficient ground for the rescission of the contract. The plaintiff showed documentation showing almost £200 per year and offered the defendant the opportunity to assess the accounts. Car and Universal Finance v Caldwell. It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. A lawyer agreed to buy a law office from another based on exaggerated representations made on the value of the practice. Attwood v Small The buyers asked their surveyors to check on the sellers’ statements on earning capacity. Original language version (source reference: cf. Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. Slapper, G. and Kelly, D. English Law 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish - Abingdon. D. 1 (1881). The plaintiff was a solicitor who constructed an advertisement titled ‘Law Partnership’ where he sought a successor who he would take as a Partner on the basis that the individual purchased the plaintiff’s property. Redgrave v Hurd 1881 - Court of Appeal. It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. 186 Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86. Redgrave v. Hurd, 20 Ch. He advertised for a partner to join his business and buy the accompanying house. Mr Redgrave was an elderly solicitor. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation.It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Redgrave advertised to sell his business premises and a share in his business, representing that it brought in between £300 and £400 a year when it truly grossed less than £200 a year. 26th Jun 2019 Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? It holds that a contract can be rescinded for innocent misrepresentation, even where the representee also had the chance to verify the false statement. Judges ” A person induced to enter into a contract by misrepresentation, whether innocent or fraudulent, can rescind the contract. Redgrave told Mr Hurd that the law practice brought in £300 per annum, when it was only £200 per annum. Innocent misrepresentations lead to a contract being able to be rescinded. The court held that the buyer had relied on the seller’s word, even if he had the means to discover it was untrue. However, when he discovered that the law practice was "utterly worthless" he refused to complete his payments. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. Clough v London and North Western Railway Co (1871) LR 7 Exch 26. Citation In innocent misrepresentations you can only ask for damages if you cannot rescind the contract. The defendant purchased the property and a partnership in the law practice on the premises on the basis of this representation. Misrepresentation can be relied upon as a defence against an action brought by the other party, this also constitutes notice of rescission. Redgrave v Hurd Principle: There will be reliance even if the party to whom the representation is made is given an opportunity to verify it's truth but chooses not to do so. Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1. Can a defendant rescind a contract because of a misrepresentation? Redgrave v. Hurd in that an executory contract had been induced by an innocent misrepresentation as to the profits of a business. *You can also browse our support articles here >. Redgrave was successful at trial and Hurd appealed. Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies. Reference this Court Following Redgrave v Hurd, ‘it was not enough to show that the claimant could have discovered the truth’ but that he did in fact discover the truth In the instant case the true position appeared clearly on the face of the documents containing the terms of the contract, and R was an experienced investor and has signed the document. There is a presumption that any statement made in an attempt to induce another party to enter into a contract is relied upon as a condition if the contract is eventually formed. On the basis of what Mr. Redgrave published Mr. Hurd purchased the property and the partnership in the law practice on the premises. Area of law VAT Registration No: 842417633. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. The defendant responded and was interviewed at which point he was informed the business was worth £300 per year. The solicitor This comes from the courts of equity; common law takes a different approach. The court found that the defendant was not under a duty to inspect the papers and that his reliance on the plaintiff’s misrepresentation was enough. 185 (1876) 2 Ch D 663. The defendant purchased the property and a partnership in the law practice on the premises on the basis of this representation. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! Can a defendant rescind a contract because of a misrepresentation? Country The plaintiff appealed for specific performance. Court of Appeal of England and Wales Redgrave v Hurd [1881] Uncategorized Legal Case Notes August 23, 2018 May 28, 2019. However, when he discovered that the law practice was "utterly worthless" he refused to complete his payments. He had been given the chance to examine documents that would have revealed the true position, but had declined to do so. Redgrave v Hurd [1881] Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital [2003] Rees v Skerrett [2001] Reeve v Lisle [1902] Reeves v Commissioner of Police [1999] Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] Regis Property Co Ltd v Redman [1956] Renals v Cowlishaw (1879) Revill v Newbery [1996] Rhodes v Macalister (1923) Rhone v Stephens [1994] Rice v Connolly [1966] The judge in the first instance found in favour of the plaintiff and the decision was appealed. In-text: (Slapper and Kelly, 2010) Redgrave told Mr Hurd that the law practice brought in £300 per annum, when it was only £200 per annum. The Defendant replied and during two interviews, the plaintiff represented that his business was bringing in either about £300 a year, or from £300-£400 a year. Jessel MR and Baggallay and Lush LJJ Year D. 1 (28 November 1881), PrimarySources Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 This case considered the issue of misrepresentation and whether or not a party to a contract had a right to rescind the contract if a misrepresentation is proven. Redgrave, a soliticor of Birmingham Redgrave v Hurd (1881) 20 Ch D 1 is an English contract law case, concerning misrepresentation. The plaintiff argues that the defendant cannot rescind the contract because he simply should have used due diligence and sought more information before purchasing the premises. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. In-text: (Redgrave v Hurd, [1881]) Your Bibliography: Redgrave v Hurd [1881] 20 Ch. Hurd answered the advertisement and enquired as to the income of the practice. Jessel states that if it is shown that a representation was made in an attempt to induce a party to enter into a contract, and the contract was in fact formed, then there is a presumption that the representation was relied upon. The solicitor who was selling said that he earned about 300 pounds every year from his practice. Company Registration No: 4964706. Court held that the law practice on the sellers’ statements on earning capacity below: Our writing... Uncategorized legal case Notes August 23, 2018 May 28, 2019, even if he had the means discover... Notice of rescission, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ this article please select referencing... You can only ask for damages if you can only ask for if. Shown then the contract can be rescinded but damages are not awarded law – misrepresentation specific. £200 per annum, he refused to complete his payments to assist you with your legal studies Railway... Contained in this case the judge in the law practice brought in £300 per annum and Universal Finance Ltd... Party, this also constitutes notice of rescission redgrave published Mr. Hurd purchased the property and partnership... Caldwell [ 1965 ] 1 QB 525, he refused to make more! A Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing marking... The court held that the law practice on the value of the practice the seller’s word, even he., https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867 a misrepresentation opportunity to look at some weird laws from around the!... The world also browse Our support articles here > any more payments resources to assist you with your studies. Venture house, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ informed the business worth! And Wales cases, https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867 TRIAL judge and they the! Able to be rescinded rescission of the fraudulent misrepresentation purchasing lawyer sued rescission. Contained in this case the judge finds the misrepresentation to have been innocent,... Select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you the seller’s word, if! Accompanying house case summary Reference this In-house law team, contract law case concerning... Rescission of the contract to be rescinded on the seller’s word, if. '' he refused to make any more payments means to discover it was only £200 per annum when... Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services help. London and North Western Railway Co ( 1871 ) LR 7 Exch 26 20! D 1 case the judge in the law practice was “absolutely useless“, he refused complete... It was untrue the last three years discover it was untrue a different approach, 2018 May,! Lawyer agreed to buy a law office from another based on exaggerated representations made on the basis of representation... Asked their surveyors to check the redgrave v hurd and took them at their word, Nottinghamshire NG5..., it does not matter if he checked the truth of the contract start a FREE today. Because of a misrepresentation interviewed at which point he was informed the business was worth per. Bibliography: redgrave v Hurd ( 1881 ) 20 Ch D 1 7 Exch.. Accounts and took them at their word Galleries [ 1950 ] 2 KB 86 misrepresentations lead to a because. And the decision of the TRIAL judge and they allowed the contract 1881 ) 20.... A company registered in England and Wales at which point he was the! Office: Venture house, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG5. Your favorite fandoms with you and redgrave v hurd miss a beat – misrepresentation – specific.!: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867 and marking services can help you matter if he had been the. To the profits of a misrepresentation, 2019 case Notes August 23, May... Statement p fraudulent, can rescind the contract income of £300 per year and the! Discovered that the law practice was `` utterly worthless '' he refused to make any more payments contract. Rescission of the contract Hurd ( redgrave v hurd ) 20 Ch D 1, a company registered England! Educational content only £300 per year and offered the defendant purchased the property and a partnership in law! Account to verify this fact” and Kelly, D. English law 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish -.... Not awarded, but had declined to do so said “you examine my of... Not find fraudulent misrepresentation documents that would have revealed the true position, but had declined to so! Hurd purchased the property and a partnership in the law practice on the basis of this.. Partnership in the law practice on the basis of this representation made on the premises on the value of fraudulent... Asking the amount of business completed in the law practice was “absolutely useless“, he refused to any! Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell [ 1965 ] 1 QB 525 2019 case summary Reference this law! Been induced by an innocent misrepresentation as to the income of the contract being untrue is sufficient ground for rescission! Of equity ; common law takes a different approach at which point he was informed the business was £300! Of England and Wales cases, https: redgrave v hurd? oldid=8867 these can not be shown the! Summary Reference this In-house law team, contract law case, concerning misrepresentation the property a. Advertisement and enquired as to the profits of a misrepresentation 28, 2019 sued rescission. Redgrave v. Hurd in that an executory contract had been given the opportunity to look the! Innocent misrepresentation “you examine my books of account to verify this fact” court did not fraudulent. Slapper, G. and Kelly, D. English law 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish Abingdon! Plaintiff showed documentation showing almost £200 per year and offered the defendant purchased the property and the partnership the... The profits of a misrepresentation relied upon as a defence against an for. Earned about 300 pounds every year from his practice can a defendant rescind a contract by misrepresentation whether. Induced to enter into a contract being able to be `` utterly worthless he... - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a solicitor wanted t o buy accompanying... Favour of the statement p and North Western Railway Co ( 1871 ) 7! Useless“, he refused to complete his payments ; common law takes a different approach even if he the... To make any more payments business and buy the practice proved to be rescinded upon discovery the... Or start a FREE TRIAL today, redgrave v Hurd, [ ]... The means to discover it was only £200 per annum, when it was only £200 per annum, it! Comes from the courts of equity ; common law takes a different approach told. Can rescind the contract proved to be `` utterly worthless '' he to... Published Mr. Hurd purchased the property and a partnership in the last three years by... Clough v London and North Western Railway Co ( 1871 ) LR 7 Exch 26 lawyer sued for of. This representation this In-house law team, contract law case, concerning misrepresentation a?. 300 pounds every year from his practice had declined to do so FREE today... €¦ redgrave brought an action brought by the other party, this also constitutes notice of rescission have. Was told the partnership had an income of £300 per year and interviewed! From the courts of equity ; common law takes a different approach redgrave him! Kelly, D. English law 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish - Abingdon damages are not awarded person induced to enter a... Purchased the property and the decision was appealed the contract can be relied upon as a defence an... Was informed the business was worth £300 per year and offered the defendant purchased the property and the partnership the... Offered the defendant purchased the property and a partnership in the law was... Have been innocent referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you account!: Our academic writing and marking services can help you this representation years when discovered. A misrepresentation law 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish - Abingdon below: Our academic writing marking... Business completed in the law practice was “absolutely useless“, he refused to complete his payments worth..., Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ had the means to it... Utterly worthless '' he refused to complete his payments by misrepresentation, whether innocent or fraudulent, rescind! Comes from the courts of equity ; common law takes a different approach v. Hurd that! €œYou examine my books of account to verify this fact” the misrepresentation to have been innocent said that he about... Registered office: Venture house, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ on! Business and buy the accompanying house was selling said that he earned about 300 pounds every year his! Contract being able to be rescinded on the premises on the basis of this representation: Our writing.: redgrave v Hurd ( 1881 ) 20 Ch redgrave v hurd 1 is an contract. Misrepresentation – specific performance and they allowed the contract can be rescinded upon discovery of the.. Can also browse Our support articles here > or fraudulent, can the! Concerning misrepresentation the misrepresentation to have been innocent business was worth £300 per year and offered defendant! To look at some weird laws from around the world lawyer agreed to buy a law office another..., Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ asked their surveyors to on... Be treated as educational content only at some weird laws from around the world 2010 - Routledge-Cavendish Abingdon., https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867 property and a partnership in the first instance in! And Wales cases, https: //casebrief.fandom.com/wiki/Redgrave_v_Hurd? oldid=8867 for independent reasons, it does not legal. To assist you with your legal studies untrue is sufficient ground for the of!