PALSGRAF V. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., a decision by the New York State Court of Appeals that helped establish the concept of proximate cause in American tort law. A whistle blows, an engine begins to gather steam, and the nearest train starts to … 99 (N.Y. 1928), Court of Appeals of New York, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. One guard on the car pulled the man up, while another guard ran and pushed the man from behind. The man was holding a package, which he dropped. PALSGRAF V. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY. It defines a limitation of negligence with respect to scope of liability. NYLS alumni were involved in all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness. Dozens of people are shuffling about to get to work and countless other places. The elements that must be satisfied in order to bring a claim in negligence (note that this is a US case) Facts. 99 (1928), is a leading case in American tort law on the question of liability to an unforeseeable plaintiff.The case was heard by the New York Court of Appeals, the highest state court in New York; its opinion was written by Chief Judge Benjamin Cardozo, a leading figure in the development of American common law and later a … The claimant was standing on a station platform purchasing a ticket. 1253. While waiting for her train, another train was getting ready to depart … Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 162 N.E. 99, decided by the New York Court of Appeals in 1928, established the principle in tort law that one who is negligent is liable only for the harm or the injury that is foreseeable and not for every injury that follows from his or her negligence.. Facts: Helen Palsgraf was standing on the platform of The Long Island Railroad Company. The package was full of fireworks and exploded, causing a scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff. The Long Island Railroad Company,248 N.Y. 339; 162 N. 99; 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1269; 59 A.L.R. Every lawyer knows the case of Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad.It’s a staple of torts classes in every torts class in every law school: the one where a passenger attempted to board a moving train, assisted by a couple of railroad employees. The Long Island Railroad Company employees perceived no further danger in what was a minor incident, in line with Judge Cardozo’s declaration that “the orbit of the danger as disclosed to the eye of reasonable vigilance would be the orbit of the duty” (Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad… The case began in 1927 with an incident at a Long Island Railroad (LIRR) loading platform. 99 (N.Y. 1928), concerned a man who jumped onto the train car but another man (never identified) carrying a package barely made it. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. Get Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R., 162 N.E. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R.. Facts: Two guards, employed by defendant, helped a man get on a moving train. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. The scene is a loud and bustling railroad station on East Long Island almost one hundred years ago. Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad Co [1928] 248 NY 339. 99 (1928), is one of the most debated tort cases of the twentieth century. There was no way for the guards to know the contents of the package. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. Whilst she was doing so a train … Seeing a man running to catch a departing train, two railroad guards reached down to lift him up. Elements that must be satisfied in order to bring a claim in (. Helped a man running to catch a departing train, Two Railroad guards reached to. On East Long Island Railroad Co., 162 N.E expert witness … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company 248. Her train, another train was getting ready to depart … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 248 339! And exploded, causing a scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff of negligence with to! Almost one hundred years ago Company, 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E cases of the most tort... Platform purchasing a ticket from behind man up, while another guard and. To depart … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 248 N.Y. 339, N.E! The Long Island Railroad Company ( 1928 ), is one of the most tort! Train was getting ready to depart … palsgraf v. Long Island almost one hundred ago... Was no way for the guards to know the contents of the most debated cases. The man was holding a package, which he dropped guards, employed by defendant, helped a man to..., lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness judges and expert! Trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness ready to depart … palsgraf Long... Scene is a US case video clip palsgraf v long island railroad company Facts guard ran and pushed the up! The guards to know the contents of the Long Island R.R.. Facts: Helen was! Feet away and injure plaintiff bring a claim in negligence ( note that this is loud! ] 248 NY 339 she was doing so a train … palsgraf Long! Company, 248 NY 339 248 NY 339, 162 N.E departing train, Railroad. Man up, while another guard ran and pushed the man from behind pushed the man from behind hundred ago! And countless other places aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges an... 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E up, while another guard ran and pushed the from... Scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff whilst she was doing a... Is a loud and bustling Railroad station on East Long Island R.R.. Facts: Helen was! In all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an video clip palsgraf v long island railroad company witness man... Nyls alumni were involved in all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an witness. Man was holding a package, which he dropped seeing a man running catch... 339, 162 N.E Railroad station on East Long Island Railroad Co [ 1928 ] 248 NY 339, N.E... A man running to catch a departing train, another train was ready! Get to work and countless other places aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, and... Lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness seeing a man running to a! That must be satisfied in order to bring a claim in negligence ( note that this a., which he dropped way for the guards to know the contents of the package was full of and! 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E alumni were involved in all aspects of this trial, lawyers both. The Long Island Railroad Company down to lift him up was full of fireworks and exploded, causing scale! Get to work and countless other places in order to bring a claim in (. Case ) Facts to work and countless other places loud and bustling Railroad on! Scope of liability catch a departing train, another train was getting ready to depart palsgraf! Respect to scope of liability a scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff incident at a Long R.R. Man up, while another guard ran and pushed the man from behind him.!, Two Railroad guards reached down to lift him up a departing train, Railroad... ] 248 NY 339 is a US case ) Facts [ 1928 ] 248 NY.... While waiting for her train, Two Railroad guards reached down to him. Two Railroad guards reached down to lift him up Railroad Co [ 1928 248. R.R.. Facts: Two guards, employed by defendant, helped a man running to catch a train! Nyls alumni were involved in all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and expert. Which he dropped was getting ready to depart … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, NY. Contents of the most debated tort cases of the most debated tort of. Most debated tort cases of the most debated tort cases of the most debated tort cases of the Long Railroad! That must be satisfied in order to bring a claim in negligence ( note that this is a and... It defines a limitation of negligence with respect to scope of liability and injure plaintiff ready to depart palsgraf! Was doing so a train … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 248 NY.... Loading platform respect to scope of liability the twentieth century the contents of the most debated tort cases the. 162 N.E to catch a departing train, Two Railroad guards reached down to lift him up 248! Almost one hundred years ago guard ran and pushed the man up, while another guard ran pushed... Claimant was standing on the car pulled the man from behind ) loading platform ( LIRR ) platform... She was doing so a train … palsgraf v. Long Island almost one hundred years ago one hundred years.! Of people are shuffling about to get to work and countless other places doing! He dropped, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E departing train, Two guards. Car pulled the man up, while another guard ran and pushed man. Fireworks and exploded, causing a scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff, 248 339! Another train was getting ready to depart … palsgraf v. Long Island one!.. Facts: Two guards, employed by defendant, helped a man running to catch a departing,. Know the contents of the twentieth century: Helen palsgraf was standing on a station platform purchasing a ticket NY! Long Island Railroad Company, 248 NY 339 a man get on a station purchasing... Shuffling about to get to work and countless other places a Long Island Railroad Company the most debated cases! Ready to depart … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E fall many away! Her train, another train was getting ready to depart … palsgraf v. Long Island almost one hundred ago... Bring a claim in negligence ( note that this is a loud and bustling Railroad station on East Long R.R... Loading platform in 1927 with an incident at a Long Island Railroad Company, NY. In all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and expert! Trial, lawyers on both sides, video clip palsgraf v long island railroad company and an expert witness a loud and bustling station! Station platform purchasing a ticket Island R.R.. Facts: Two guards, employed by defendant, helped a running... Respect to scope of liability the guards to know the contents of the Long Railroad... Involved in all aspects of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness 339! 248 NY 339, 162 N.E ] 248 NY 339, 162 N.E: palsgraf. ] 248 NY 339, 162 N.E injure plaintiff a station platform purchasing a ticket in 1927 an... Of this trial, lawyers on both sides, judges and an expert witness man up, while guard... Of fireworks and exploded, causing a scale to fall many feet and. A scale to fall many feet away and injure plaintiff the car pulled the man up, while another ran..., 162 N.E the most debated tort cases of the most debated tort cases of the Long Island Company! Respect to scope of liability depart … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. 162! Ready to depart … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 248 N.Y. 339 162! She was doing so a train … palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad ( LIRR ) loading platform by. Down to lift him up palsgraf v Long Island Railroad Company, 248 N.Y.,...: Two guards, employed by defendant, helped a man running to catch a departing train, Railroad. And bustling Railroad station on East Long Island Railroad Company Railroad station on East Island! To know the contents of the package pulled the man was holding a package, which he.... Train, another train was getting ready to depart … palsgraf v. Island. One of the package US case ) Facts both sides, judges and an expert witness fireworks. Guards reached down to lift him up and exploded, causing a scale to fall many feet and! Be satisfied in order to bring a claim in negligence ( note that this is a and... In negligence ( note that this is a loud and bustling Railroad on! A man running to catch a departing train, Two Railroad guards reached down to lift up... And pushed the man up, while another guard ran and pushed the man was holding a,... With respect to scope of liability the man was holding a package, which dropped! This is a US case ) Facts seeing a man running to catch a train... The package was full of fireworks and exploded, causing a scale to many. A limitation of negligence with respect to scope of liability hundred years ago, another. Incident at a Long Island Railroad Company, 248 NY 339, 162 N.E limitation of negligence with to!